CSM_BITS_ANM_0003
Insufficient Data Entry Space in Various Fields
Status: Client confirmation received - awaiting final disposition; not marked closed.
Updated Oct 9, 2026 3:08 AM IST
1. BUG REGISTRATION
| S.No. | Attribute | Entry |
|---|
| 1 | Safety Anomaly ID | CSM_BITS_ANM_0003 |
|---|
| 2 | Bug Title | Insufficient Data Entry Space in Various Fields |
|---|
| 3 | Bug Description | The space provided for data entry in various fields of the CSM platform is insufficient for entering and viewing longer information. |
|---|
| 4 | Detection Source | User Observation |
|---|
| 5 | Initial Evidence | BITS users reported that the available space in certain data-entry fields is insufficient for entering and reviewing the required information. |
|---|
| 6 | Reported By | BITS University User |
|---|
| 7 | Reported Date/Time | 10/7/2026, 9:42AM |
|---|
2.INITIAL ASSESSMENT
| S.No. | Attribute | Entry |
|---|
| 1 | Affected Item | CSM Tool – Data Entry Fields |
|---|
| 2 | Version / Configuration | Current deployed CSM BITS site hosted on client-provided server |
|---|
| 3 | Anomaly Classification | UI / Usability Issue |
|---|
| 4 | Safety Relevant? | No |
|---|
| 5 | Initial Safety Impact | No direct safety impact identified. The issue primarily affects usability and ease of data entry. |
|---|
| 6 | Responsible Person | Aisemi CSM Developers |
|---|
| 7 | Initial Evidence | User feedback indicating that the available field space is insufficient for entering and viewing longer data. |
|---|
| 8 | Initial Assessment Comment | The issue appears to be related to the UI design of the affected data-entry fields. The available space should be reviewed and increased where required to improve data entry and readability.
Client clarification: The client has confirmed that the existing 550-character limit is sufficient. An increase to that limit asked by end user is therefore put on hold. |
|---|
| 9 | Replication / Triage Status | Client clarification received - existing 550-character limit accepted as sufficient; final disposition pending review. |
|---|
| 10 | State Entry Date/Time | 10/7/2026, 11:00AM |
|---|
| 11 | State Exit Date/Time | 10/09/2026, 09:50PM |
|---|
3.ANALYSIS & ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
| S.No. | Attribute | Entry |
|---|
| 1 | Reproducible? | ? |
|---|
| 2 | Reproduction Result | ? |
|---|
| 3 | Reproduction Steps | ? |
|---|
| 4 | Failure Mode | ? |
|---|
| 5 | Failure Mechanism | ? |
|---|
| 6 | Technical Analysis | ? |
|---|
| 7 | Impact Analysis | ? |
|---|
| 8 | RCA Method | ? |
|---|
| 9 | Root Cause | ? |
|---|
| 10 | Contributing Cause | ? |
|---|
| 11 | Verification Gap | ? |
|---|
| 12 | Analysis Conclusion | Requirement clarification: The existing 550-character limit meets the client's stated needs. No increase to the character limit is required on this basis. This is client acceptance of the limit, not a technical root-cause or test conclusion. |
|---|
| 13 | Analysis Evidence | Client confirmation, as communicated with client: the existing 550-character limit is sufficient. Client name, confirmation date/time and supporting correspondence reference were not supplied with this update. |
|---|
| 14 | RCA Dependency / Delay | ? |
|---|
| 15 | State Entry Date/Time | ? |
|---|
| 16 | State Exit Date/Time | ? |
|---|
4.CRITICALITY / SAFETY EVALUATION
| S.No. | Attribute | Entry |
|---|
| 1 | Safety Goal Impact | ? |
|---|
| 2 | Safety Requirement Impact | ? |
|---|
| 3 | Safety Mechanism Impact | ? |
|---|
| 4 | Criticality | ? |
|---|
| 5 | ASIL Impact | ? |
|---|
| 6 | Risk Evaluation | ? |
|---|
| 7 | Residual Risk | ? |
|---|
| 8 | Evaluation Rationale | ? |
|---|
| 9 | Evaluation Evidence | ? |
|---|
| 10 | State Entry Date/Time | ? |
|---|
| 11 | State Exit Date/Time | ? |
|---|
5.CONTAINMENT & CORRECTIVE ACTION
| S.No. | Attribute | Entry |
|---|
| 1 | Containment Required? | ? |
|---|
| 2 | Containment Action | ? |
|---|
| 3 | Corrective Action | No character-limit increase required based on client confirmation. No software modification or implemented fix is asserted by this update. |
|---|
| 4 | Safety Measure | ? |
|---|
| 5 | Change Required? | No increase to the 550-character limit required per client confirmation. Any separate field-display/readability change remains outside this confirmation. |
|---|
| 6 | Change Reference | ? |
|---|
| 7 | Action Owner | ? |
|---|
| 8 | Implementation Status | ? |
|---|
| 9 | Action Evidence | ? |
|---|
| 10 | State Entry Date/Time | ? |
|---|
| 11 | State Exit Date/Time | ? |
|---|
6.VERIFICATION & EFFECTIVENESS
| S.No. | Attribute | Entry |
|---|
| 1 | Fix Verification | ? |
|---|
| 2 | Verification Method | ? |
|---|
| 3 | Verification Result | ? |
|---|
| 4 | Effectiveness Verified? | ? |
|---|
| 5 | Residual Impact | ? |
|---|
| 6 | Verification Conclusion | ? |
|---|
| 7 | Verification Evidence | ? |
|---|
| 8 | Verifier | ? |
|---|
| 9 | State Entry Date/Time | ? |
|---|
| 10 | State Exit Date/Time | ? |
|---|
7.CLOSURE & APPROVAL
| S.No. | Attribute | Entry |
|---|
| 1 | Closure Route | Proposed disposition: accept existing character limit based on client confirmation; subject to final anomaly review and closure decision. |
|---|
| 2 | Safety Measure Adequate? | ? |
|---|
| 3 | Effectiveness Verified? | ? |
|---|
| 4 | Unreasonable Risk? | ? |
|---|
| 5 | Closure Rationale | The client confirmed that the existing 550-character limit is sufficient, so an increase is unnecessary. Before formal closure, confirm whether this addresses the entire original concern about entering and viewing information. |
|---|
| 6 | Closure Evidence | ? |
|---|
| 7 | Rationale Reviewed? | ? |
|---|
| 8 | Review Comments | ? |
|---|
| 9 | Closure Decision | Pending final review/approval; client acceptance of the character limit recorded. |
|---|
| 10 | Reviewer | ? |
|---|
| 11 | Final State | Client confirmation received - awaiting final disposition; not marked closed. |
|---|
| 12 | State Entry Date/Time | ? |
|---|
| 13 | State Exit Date/Time | ? |
|---|
